Locke v. Davey
United States Supreme Court
540 U.S. 714 (2004)
The state of Washington established the Promise Scholarship Program to assist academically gifted students with postsecondary education expenses. However, students could not use the scholarship to pursue a degree in devotional theology. Joshua Davey, (plaintiff) discovered that he could not use his scholarship to pursue a pastoral ministries major at a private Christian college. Davey filed suit against Locke, the state official responsible for administering the Promise Scholarship Program, in federal district court on the grounds that Washington’s ban on the use of state scholarship funds for religious education violated his rights under the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause. The district court rejected his claim, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 159,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.