M.M. v. D.V.

66 Cal. App. 5th 733, 281 Cal. Rptr. 3d 361 (2021)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

M.M. v. D.V.

California Court of Appeal
66 Cal. App. 5th 733, 281 Cal. Rptr. 3d 361 (2021)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Child was conceived when Child’s mother, Mother (defendant), was engaging in sexual relations with both M.M. (plaintiff) and T.M. (defendant). Mother told M.M. he was not Child’s biological father. After Child was born, T.M. signed a voluntary parentage declaration, and Mother and T.M. married shortly thereafter. Approximately two years later, DNA testing confirmed that M.M. was Child’s biological father. Mother allowed M.M. several brief visits with Child before cutting off further contact. M.M. did not offer to pay child support. M.M. filed a petition to acquire status as Child’s third parent, arguing that he was entitled to presumed parent status as an unwed biological father because Mother obstructed his ability to assume parental rights. M.M. admitted he did not have an existing relationship with Child and did not challenge T.M.’s parental status. The trial court denied M.M.’s petition, holding that (1) M.M. did not meet the Adoption of Kelsey S. requirements to acquire presumed parent status because he had not assumed emotional, financial, and parental responsibility for Child after learning about their biological relationship; and (2) regardless, he was not entitled to be named as Child’s third parent because M.M. did not have an existing parental relationship with Child, and, therefore, it would not be detrimental to Child to have only two parents. M.M. appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Irion, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership