Madrone v. Madrone
Oregon Court of Appeals
350 P.3d 495 (2015)
Karah Gretchen Madrone and Lorrena Thompson Madrone were in a same-sex relationship. During their relationship, Lorrena used artificial insemination to conceive a child, and she gave birth to a daughter, R. After R’s birth, Oregon’s law permitting same-sex couples to register domestic partnerships took effect, and Lorrena and Karah registered. The couple never took steps to add Karah’s name to R’s birth certificate. The couple later separated, and Karah filed a petition to dissolve their domestic partnership and to declare herself a legal parent of R. The trial court granted summary judgment on the petition. Lorrena appealed, arguing that she never intended to marry Karah before R was born and therefore summary judgment could not be granted.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hadlock, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.