Madrone v. Madrone
Oregon Court of Appeals
350 P.3d 495 (2015)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Karah Gretchen Madrone and Lorrena Thompson Madrone were in a same-sex relationship. During their relationship, Lorrena used artificial insemination to conceive a child, and she gave birth to a daughter, R. After R’s birth, Oregon’s law permitting same-sex couples to register domestic partnerships took effect, and Lorrena and Karah registered. The couple never took steps to add Karah’s name to R’s birth certificate. The couple later separated, and Karah filed a petition to dissolve their domestic partnership and to declare herself a legal parent of R. The trial court granted summary judgment on the petition. Lorrena appealed, arguing that she never intended to marry Karah before R was born and therefore summary judgment could not be granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hadlock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.