Supreme Court of California
131 Cal. Rptr. 873 (1976)
Sarane Fonstein (plaintiff) was married to Harold Fonstein (defendant) during the time that he held an ownership interest in a law partnership. During the divorce proceedings, the trial court found that Harold's interest in his law partnership was a community-property interest. The trial court further found that the community-property interest in Harold's law partnership could not be divided in kind. The trial court did not find any evidence that Harold had intended to withdraw from his law partnership in the foreseeable future. However, in valuing the community-property interest in Harold's law partnership based upon the withdrawal value, the trial court offset the value of that partnership interest against the tax liability that would be incurred if Harold did withdraw. Sarane appealed the trial court's decision to deduct the potential tax liability against the value of Harold's partnership interest.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.