Marriage of Hrudka

919 P.2d 179 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marriage of Hrudka

Arizona Court of Appeals
919 P.2d 179 (1995)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1978, Joe Hrudka (defendant) and Denise Hrudka (plaintiff) married. The couple lived a lavish lifestyle. During their marriage, the Hrudkas used over $1 million in community funds to purchase at least 45 items of jewelry. Joe also purchased a 1987 Rolls Royce, paid for partially by trading in an older Rolls Royce. In 1991, Denise filed for divorce. At trial, Denise testified that most of the jewelry and the car were gifts to her from Joe, while Joe testified that most of the items had been purchased as an “investment” for the couple’s later years. Other witnesses testified that Joe had traded in an old Rolls Royce around the time of purchasing the new one and that it had been the salesman’s idea to deliver the new car with a red bow wrapped around it. The court determined that 20 jewelry items were Denise’s separate property, nine items were Joe’s separate property, and the remaining items, including the Rolls Royce, were community property. Denise appealed, challenging the court’s characterization of items as community property.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ehrlich, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership