Supreme Court of Arizona
752 P.2d 1026 (1986)
Richard Martin (plaintiff) and Mary Martin (defendant) were married in 1959, and they traveled extensively throughout the world during their marriage. In August 1979, Richard and Mary moved to California. In December 1979, Mary moved into a home in a planned retirement community in Prescott, Arizona and lived separately from Richard. Richard continued to support Mary and initially intended to move into the home in the Arizona planned retirement community upon his own retirement. However, in 1982, before Richard ever moved to Arizona, Mary filed for divorce. Richard claimed that California law applied to the division of property and assets and, further, that under California law, all of his income since the time that he and Mary lived separately was his separate property and not community property. The Arizona trial court ruled that, under Arizona law, all of Richard's income from the time that he and Mary separated until the divorce constituted community-property earnings. Richard appealed the trial court's decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brooks, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.