Marriage of Thomas

821 P.2d 1227 (1991)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marriage of Thomas

Washington Court of Appeals
821 P.2d 1227 (1991)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1940, Eunice Thomas (plaintiff) and Marvin Thomas (defendant) married. The couple accumulated community property worth over $1 million during their marriage, including rental properties. Marvin managed the rental properties and controlled rental income. In 1985, the Thomases separated. In 1987, a trial was held to determine a fair division of community property. During the divorce proceedings, Marvin was ordered, twice, to provide a complete accounting related to the rental properties during the separation period, including rental income, expenses, mortgage payments, repairs, taxes, and insurance. Marvin failed to comply. The trial court found that Marvin had received over $100,000 in rental income during the separation period, mostly unshared with Eunice. Lacking information to properly calculate net rental income, the court decided it would subtract mortgage payments from rental income to arrive at net rental income, and then the court offset the calculated amount with funds in Eunice’s possession from the sale of a different asset so that Eunice did not receive a separate award of rental income. Eunice appealed, challenging the fairness of the trial court’s treatment of rental income.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shields, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership