Court of Appeal of California
262 Cal. Rptr. 783 (1989)
Elaine Watt (plaintiff) and David Watt (defendant) were married from 1972–1981. During the entire marriage, Elaine worked full-time, and David was a student, ultimately receiving his medical degree five months after the parties separated. The couple moved to Hawaii in 1974 for David to continue his studies and lived a sparse lifestyle in order to get by on Elaine’s income without incurring additional debt. While the parties’ divorce action was pending, the California legislature amended several provisions of the Family Code affecting spousal reimbursement and spousal support for contributions to the education of the other spouse. The trial court ruled that Elaine had made only a minimal contribution to David’s education and that this contribution did not qualify for consideration as to spousal support. Elaine appealed the trial court’s ruling.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.