Court of Appeal of California
189 Cal. Rptr 336 (1983)
Mr. Wright (plaintiff) and Mrs. Wright (defendant) were married for 12 years and separated in June 1976. Less than one month after the separation of the parties, Mr. Wright received a severance payment in the amount of $24,208.64 from the hospital where he had been employed since 1972 as an assistant administrator. The trial court heard testimony from the hospital administrator that the severance-payment amount was not based upon the past performance of Mr. Wright but was based upon the difficulties that the hospital anticipated Mr. Wright would have in securing new employment. Both Mrs. Wright and Mr. Wright's father-in-law, who was employed as the hospital chaplain, had communicated directly with the hospital administrator that they intended to make Mr. Wright's employment situation as difficult as possible. The trial court held that the severance payment was community property and awarded Mrs. Wright a one-half interest in the severance payment. Mr. Wright appealed the trial court's determination.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Andreen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.