Martinez v. Lopez
Texas Court of Appeals
2011 WL 2112806 (2011)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
In 2000, Jilverto Martinez (defendant) was married to his wife when he began dating Martha Lopez (plaintiff), who was pregnant with a child, A.L., from another relationship. Martinez’s divorce was final in June 2001, and Lopez gave birth to Martinez’s child, G.M, the following month. Martinez, Lopez, A.L, and G.M. began living together upon G.M.’s birth. Martinez and Lopez had a second child together, J.M., in 2002. The two adults and three children lived together until March 2008. In May 2008, G.M began to live with Martinez. Martinez later petitioned for custody of and parenting time with J.M. Lopez responded with a counterpetition for divorce, alleging that Lopez and Martinez had a common-law marriage. At trial, Lopez testified that she and Martinez presented themselves as husband and wife to friends and relatives; Martinez financially supported the family while Lopez managed all the domestic chores and childcare; Martinez and Lopez raised the children as father and mother; and Martinez and Lopez shopped for a truck, property, and a trailer together, though Lopez’s name did not appear on any of the titles to the property. Martinez claimed A.L., G.M., and J.M. as his dependents on his tax return and filed as head of household. Lopez admitted during trial that Martinez had informed Lopez that Martinez was not Lopez’s husband, Martinez was careful to not pass as her husband, and Martinez did not view or treat Lopez as his wife. Lopez testified that she felt like Martinez’s wife. Martinez did not testify whether he ever agreed to be married to Lopez but did not contradict any of Lopez’s testimony. The trial court found that Lopez and Martinez did have a common-law marriage. Martinez appealed, arguing that Lopez’s testimony established that Martinez did not agree to marry.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Keyes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.