Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
United States Supreme Court
138 S.Ct. 1718 (No. 16-111) (2018)
Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins (the couple) (plaintiffs) asked Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. (defendant), to create a special cake celebrating the couple's same-sex wedding. Phillips refused because he held sincere religious objections to same-sex marriage. Phillips offered to sell generic cakes to the couple. The couple filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission (defendant), triggering the commission's multilevel review. The couple claimed Phillips violated Colorado's law barring discrimination against customers on the basis of sexual orientation. Phillips argued that forcing him to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple would violate his First Amendment rights to free speech and religious freedom. At the same time, the commission allowed three other bakers to refuse William Jack's requests for a cake expressing religious opposition to same-sex marriage. In the final stage of the commission's proceedings in the Phillips case, several commissioners implied that religious objections should never influence a public businessman's decision to withhold services. One commissioner disparaged religion and noted its historic role in upholding discrimination, intolerance, and even genocide. The commission ruled for the couple. The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling, distinguishing the other cake cases on the grounds the commission found the customers' requests offensive. The Colorado Supreme Court declined review. Phillips appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Gorsuch, J.)
Concurrence (Kagan, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.