Mata v. Avianca, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2023 WL 3696209 (2023)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Roberto Mata (plaintiff) sued Avianca, Inc. (defendant). Avianca filed a motion to dismiss. Mata’s attorney, Peter LoDuca, submitted a response to the motion to dismiss that included numerous citations to cases that apparently did not exist, including fake quotes and fake internal citations. To create the response, LoDuca used the artificial-intelligence program ChatGPT. The district court directed LoDuca to file an affidavit with copies of certain judicial opinions to which he had cited. LoDuca filed an affidavit with the cases appended, but the cases appeared to be fake.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Castel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.