From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.
Maryland Court of Appeals
719 A.2d 119 (1998)
Facts
Even though her lease prohibited pets, Shelley Morton kept her boyfriend’s pit bull in her apartment and sometimes chained him outside. The dog was not aggressive when Morton was present but growled and acted vicious when she wasn’t. Despite many reports of dangerous encounters, management did nothing about the dog and did not evict Morton. Morton was called away when her friend, Shanita Matthews (plaintiff), was visiting with her 16-month old son. The dog attacked and killed the baby, his mother unable to free him from its jaws. Matthews sued the owner of the apartments, Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc., and the management company, Monocle Management, Ltd. (defendants). The jury awarded Matthews over $5 million, but the appellate court reversed, finding the owner and management had no duty to a tenant’s social guests. Matthews appealed, arguing that the owner and management maintained control over a known, dangerous condition on the property by allowing an extremely vicious pit pull to remain despite the no-pets provision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eldridge, J.)
Dissent (Chasanow, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
