McCabe v. American Honda Motor Co.

100 Cal. App. 4th 1111 (2002)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCabe v. American Honda Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal
100 Cal. App. 4th 1111 (2002)

Facts

Lucille McCabe (plaintiff) was injured when the airbag in her Honda Civic did not deploy during a head-on collision with a Cadillac traveling at high speed. McCabe sued American Honda Motor Company (Honda) (defendant), alleging the airbag was defective in both manufacture and design. Honda provided the expert declaration of an engineer who reconstructed the accident and determined that the airbag performed as designed. McCabe testified that she expected the airbag would deploy, and she presented pictures of the damage and eyewitness testimony to the high speed of the Cadillac. However, McCabe did not provide expert testimony to contradict Honda’s engineer. The trial court granted Honda’s motion for summary judgment, which argued the airbag performed as intended. McCabe appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Perluss, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership