McGee v. Gonyo
Vermont Supreme Court
140 A.3d 162 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Debra McGee (plaintiff) and Justin Gonyo (defendant) signed a Voluntary Acknowledgement of Parentage (VAP) stating that they were the child’s biological parents. However, the parties knew that Gonyo was not the biological father. The Office of Child Support (plaintiff) moved for child support and genetic testing despite the VAP. Gonyo opposed the motion and moved to establish his parentage of the child. The family court found that Gonyo lacked standing to bring a parentage claim because he was not the biological father. The family court also set aside the VAP as a fraud perpetrated on the court. Gonyo appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eaton, J.)
Dissent (Robinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.