Micciche v. Billings

727 P.2d 367 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Micciche v. Billings

Colorado Supreme Court
727 P.2d 367 (1986)

Facts

Joe Micciche (defendant) was one of three shareholders of Colorado-incorporated Mountain States Welding and Sheetmetal, Inc. (Mountain). Micciche also was Mountain’s vice president. In 1979, Colorado suspended Mountain from conducting business in the state due to Mountain’s failure to file a required corporate report, but Mountain continued to do business in Colorado, anyway. David Billings (plaintiff) was a Mountain employee in Colorado. In 1980, Billings was injured while working for Mountain, leading to Billings winning a workers’-compensation award against Mountain. Upon learning of Mountain’s suspension, Billings moved to reopen his workers’-compensation case to impose personal liability on Micciche. The workers’-compensation officer determined that Micciche was personally liable to Billings due to Mountain’s suspension. The Industrial Commission reversed, ruling that (1) Mountain’s suspension did not extinguish Mountain as a corporation and that Micciche thus was not personally liable and (2) Micciche might be personally liable to Billings under a corporate-veil-piercing theory. Both Micciche and Billings appealed to the court of appeals, which ruled that Micciche was personally liable. Micciche appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Quinn, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership