Middendorf v. Middendorf
Supreme Court of Ohio
696 N.E.2d 575 (1998)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Max Middendorf and Pat Middendorf were married. At the time the Middendorfs married, Max owned Middendorf Stockyard Company (MSC), which was valued at $201,389. As the owner of MSC, Max played a vital role in managing the company, including countless decisions on buying and selling hogs. When the Middendorfs divorced, MSC was valued at $309,930. The trial court found that the appreciation in value of MSC of $108,541 during the marriage was marital property to be distributed between Max and Pat. The court of appeals affirmed. Max appealed, arguing that the appreciation was due to increases in the hog market generally, not his labor specifically.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stratton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.