From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Minnesota Life Ins. Co. v. Rings
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
240 F. Supp.3d 754 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
David Rings shot his wife Teresa, then himself. Experts could not determine who died first. David had two life-insurances policies through his employer naming Teresa as sole beneficiary that required her to be living on David’s date of death to receive benefits. However, the policies stated that if both died simultaneously, benefits would be paid as if David outlived Teresa. Minnesota Life Insurance Company (plaintiff) petitioned the court to decide whether benefits should go to David’s mother, Judy Rings (codefendant) (his closest surviving relative), or to Teresa’s son, Chase Lee (codefendant).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kemp, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
