Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd v. Duma Forklifts NV

Case C-129/17 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd v. Duma Forklifts NV

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-129/17 (2018)

Facts

Automotive company Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd. (Mitsubishi) (plaintiff) also manufactured forklifts. Mitsubishi forklifts were officially imported into the European Economic Area (EEA)—an extension of the European Union’s single market—by Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe BV (MCFE) (plaintiff). However, Duma Forklifts NV (Duma) (defendant) and G.S. International BVBA (GSI) (defendant), both based in Belgium, facilitated the import of Mitsubishi forklifts into the EEA and made modifications for the European market without the authorization of Mitsubishi or MCFE. Some of the unauthorized imports were sold with Mitsubishi trademarks intact. In other cases, Duma and GSI removed the existing trademarks and added their own signs. Mitsubishi and MCFE brought a trademark-infringement action against Duma and GSI in Belgium. The Belgian court held that the unauthorized sale of forklifts bearing Mitsubishi trademarks constituted infringement. However, the court was unsure how to proceed on the matter of the forklifts whose Mitsubishi marks had been removed. The court referred the matter to the European Union Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership