Montenegro v. Avila
Texas Court of Appeals
365 S.W.3d 822 (2012)
Avila (plaintiff) and Montenegro (defendant) met in November 2003 on a dating site. Avila later learned that Montenegro lived in Bogota, Colombia, rather than in Miami, Florida, like he claimed. Montenegro and Avila decided to meet in Juarez, Mexico, in June 2004. In November 2004, Montenegro and Avila entered an engagement after Avila visited Montenegro in Colombia. At Montenegro’s insistence, Avila filed for a fiancé visa for Montenegro, and Montenegro moved to Texas to live with Avila. On September 3, 2005, Avila and Montenegro married in Texas. Montenegro immediately filed for a two-year conditional residency card. After their marriage, Avila worked and added Montenegro to her bank accounts. Montenegro started withdrawing money out of Avila’s accounts without her consent. Avila later testified that Montenegro often rejected her sexual advances and only had sexual intercourse with her using birth control, despite her desire to have children. Montenegro testified that he obtained a job in 2006 and reported to his employer that Avila was physically, verbally, and sexually abusing him. In December 2007, Montenegro received his permanent green card and began withdrawing from Avila. On February 12, 2008, Avila overheard Montenegro telling his mother that he was leaving her; when she returned from work later that day, she discovered Montenegro had taken all his belongings to another city. Montenegro confirmed to Avila that he had left her. In February 2008, Avila filed for an annulment, and Montenegro filed a counterpetition seeking a divorce. In October 2010, the trial court granted an annulment of the marriage based on Montenegro’s fraud. Montenegro appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rivera, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.