Monty S. v. Jason W.

290 Neb. 1048, 863 N.W.2d 484 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Monty S. v. Jason W.

Nebraska Supreme Court
290 Neb. 1048, 863 N.W.2d 484 (2014)

SC
Play video

Facts

Rebecca and Jason (defendants) were friends with Teresa and Monty (plaintiffs). As Rebecca was unable to have children, Teresa agreed to be Rebecca and Jason’s surrogate. The parties agreed that Teresa and Monty would conceive a child and that Rebecca and Jason would adopt the child. The parties agreed that it would be an open adoption, with Teresa and Monty maintaining a role in the child’s life. After the child was born, Teresa and Monty signed documents relinquishing their parental rights to the child and consenting to Rebecca and Jason’s adoption. Before the child’s first birthday, Teresa and Monty filed a petition for habeas corpus, seeking return of the child. The district court held a hearing to determine the best interests of the child and placed the child in Teresa and Monty’s custody. Rebecca and Jason appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heavican, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership