Morgan v. Morgan

12 A.3d 192 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Morgan v. Morgan

Supreme Court of New Jersey
12 A.3d 192 (2011)

SC

Facts

Paul Morgan and Kristin Leary were married and had two children. Morgan and Leary divorced and were given joint custody of the children. Leary was given primary physical custody. Leary got engaged to another man and wished to move from New Jersey to Massachusetts, where her fiancé and her entire family lived. Anticipating this, Morgan filed a motion for modification of custody based on changed circumstances. Leary filed a cross-motion for permission to move to Massachusetts with the children. The trial court denied Morgan’s motion and Leary’s cross-motion. The appellate court reversed and remanded for an order permitting Leary to move. Morgan appealed. After the initial motions were filed, Leary’s engagement ended, Morgan remarried and had a son with his new wife, and one of Morgan and Leary’s children became old enough to express her preference legally on the matter of relocation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Long, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership