MSOF Corp. v. Exxon Corp.

295 F.3d 485 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

MSOF Corp. v. Exxon Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
295 F.3d 485 (2002)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

MSOF Corporation (MSOF) (plaintiff) owned land in the Devil’s Swamp region of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Petro Processors of Louisiana, Inc. (PPI) (defendant) was the owner and operator of two hazardous-waste disposal facilities in the Devil’s Swamp region, approximately three miles north of MSOF’s property. In 1980, the United States Department of Justice sued PPI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). In 1984, a consent decree was entered that required remediation of the PPI facility and that the site be monitored for 30 years after remediation under the supervision and jurisdiction of the district court. In 1994, MSOF filed suit against PPI, alleging that toxic chemicals from the PPI facility had contaminated their property. MSOF alleged negligent and strict-liability torts under state law. PPI argued that MSOF was seeking relief under CERCLA. PPI removed the case to federal district court, and MSOF filed a motion to remand, asserting that the district court did not have jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion to remand on the grounds that MSOF asserted a claim under CERCLA, and therefore federal jurisdiction existed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Garwood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership