From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
141 F.3d 1059 (1998)
Dr. Per Ingvar Branemark (plaintiff) conducted a study of people who received dental implants over a 10-year period and published his findings in a book. Branemark’s book included images of titanium implants pitted with microscopic irregularities, called micropits, that would help the implants stick securely to the jawbone. After publishing his book, Branemark patented the implant design shown in his book. His patent claim was for a titanium implant marked with micropits. Branemark did not disclose his book in his patent application. Branemark licensed the patent to Nobelpharma AB and Nobelpharma USA, Inc. (Nobelpharma) (plaintiffs). Later, Nobelpharma and Branemark sued Implant Innovations, Inc. (Implant Innovations) (defendant) for patent infringement. Implant Innovations brought a counterclaim against Nobelpharma for antitrust violations. Trial evidence showed that, in his patent claim, Branemark had failed to disclose key information about how to manufacture the micropits. The district court ruled that Nobelpharma’s patent was invalid as a matter of law because the patent failed to disclose the best mode of producing the implants. After a further trial on the antitrust counterclaim, a jury found that, to eliminate competition in the implant market, Nobelpharma had pursued an infringement suit against Implant Innovations for a patent that Nobelpharma knew was invalid. The jury found this was an antitrust violation and awarded Implant Innovations $3.3 million. Nobelpharma moved for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, but the trial court denied the motion. Nobelpharma appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.