Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

537 F.3d 1006 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
537 F.3d 1006 (2008)

DC

Facts

In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act (CWA) in an effort to eliminate pollutant discharge from navigable waters by 1985. Although § 301(a) of the CWA outlawed pollutant discharges into navigable waters, Congress made several exceptions for various types of discharges. Under § 402 of the CWA, Congress authorized point-source discharges to be exempted from the CWA’s prohibitions pursuant to an individual or general permit issued by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), a program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant). In 1973, § 122.3(a) of the EPA regulations was amended to exclude several categories of vessel discharges from NPDES-permit requirements, including discharges incidental to a vessel’s operation (the regulatory exemption). Environmental advocates had growing concerns about vessel discharges, particularly cargo ships’ ballast water used for maintenance purposes. Ballast water taken on in one location and released in another introduced organisms, including invasive species and bacteria, into new ecosystems globally and was linked to the spread of invasive Zebra mussels and cholera bacteria. The Northwest Environmental Advocates and other environmental groups (the environmental advocates) (plaintiffs) challenged the regulatory exemption, arguing that the EPA did not have the authority to exclude vessel discharges from NPDES-permit requirements under the CWA. The district court found that the EPA had exceeded the authority conferred by the CWA in enacting the regulatory exemption and permanently enjoined the exemption’s enforcement. The EPA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership