People v. Ezeonu
Supreme Court of New York
588 N.Y.S.2d 116 (1992)
Gregory Ezeonu (defendant) was indicted for the rape of a 13-year-old girl. Ezeonu, a Nigerian national, was married at the time of the offense. Ezeonu sought to raise as a defense that he was also married to the young girl at the time of the alleged rape. Ezeonu claimed that Nigerian custom permitted him to take a “second” or “junior” wife given to him by the young girl’s parents in Nigeria. Nigerian law permitted a man to have multiple wives. Ezeonu claimed that if he were lawfully married to the girl at the time of the offenses he could not be held criminally liable for rape.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fisch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.