Perry v. Schwarzenegger
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
704 F. Supp. 2d 921 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
California (defendant) enacted Proposition 8, which stated that only marriage between a man and a woman was valid and recognized in California. Two same-sex couples (plaintiffs) were denied marriage licenses in California under this law and could only enter into domestic partnerships. The plaintiffs brought suit on the grounds that the law deprived the plaintiffs of due process and equal protection of the laws. The proponents of Proposition 8 intervened to argue that the law advanced the state interests of: (1) preserving the tradition of marriage as between a man and a woman, (2) implementing social change slowly and incrementally, (3) promoting opposite-sex parenting in the best interests of children, (4) protecting the First Amendment rights of individuals opposed to same-sex marriage, and (5) treating same-sex marriage differently from opposite-sex marriage.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.