Pierce v. Underwood
United States Supreme Court
487 U.S. 552 (1986)
- Written by Susie Cowen, JD
Facts
Ms. Underwood and other individuals (plaintiffs) settled their lawsuit against the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (Secretary) (defendant). Upon finding that the Secretary’s position was not “substantially justified” within the meaning of the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), the court awarded the plaintiffs attorney’s fees. The court allowed fees in excess of the EAJA’s $75 hourly cap. The Secretary appealed the award of attorney’s fees. The court of appeals held that the district court’s holding was not an abuse of discretion. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.