From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
1987 WL 341211 (1987)
Pioneer Hi-Bred International (Pioneer) (plaintiff) was a company that created hybrid seed corn through genetic mixing. Pioneer sued Holden Foundation Seeds (Holden) (defendant), alleging that Holden had wrongfully acquired genetic information from some of Pioneer’s genetically modified seed lines for Holden’s own use. Pioneer claimed this violated Pioneer’s property rights in two ways. First, Pioneer argued Holden’s use of the genetic seed information was a misappropriation of Pioneer’s trade-secret information. Second, Pioneer argued Holden’s use of this genetic information was a conversion of Pioneer’s property rights in these modified genetic qualities.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.