Porn v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
93 F.3d 31 (1996)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Connecticut resident Daryl Porn (plaintiff) was in a car collision caused by Lori Willoughby. Because Willoughby’s insurance did not fully cover Porn’s damages, Porn sought underinsured motorist coverage from his insurer, National Grange Mutual Insurance Company (National Grange) (defendant). After National Grange refused to pay, Porn successfully sued it for breach of contract in federal court. Six months later, Porn filed another suit against National Grange in federal court, asserting claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violations of Connecticut consumer protection statutes (collectively, bad-faith claims). The court awarded summary judgment to National Grange on the basis of claim preclusion. Porn appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stahl, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
