Porter v. Department of Health and Human Services

286 S.W.3d 686 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Porter v. Department of Health and Human Services

Arkansas Supreme Court
286 S.W.3d 686 (2008)

SC
Play video

Facts

D.P., age 16, married 34-year-old Ralph Rodriguez. D.P.’s parents, Mark Porter (defendant) and his ex-wife, Diana Rolen, believed that Rodriguez was in his 20s and consented to the marriage. The Department of Health and Human Services (plaintiff) petitioned the court to remove D.P and her sister from their parents’ home, using their consent to D.P.’s marriage as one of the grounds. D.P.’s guardian ad litem moved to void D.P.’s marriage to Rodriguez. D.P.’s therapist testified that D.P. was immature and had been neglected by her parents but that she had a “strong sense of herself,” was smart, and was responsible. The trial court voided the marriage based on (1) a misrepresentation of Rodriguez’s age, (2) the best interests of D.P., and (3) D.P.’s mental capacity. On the third ground, the trial court based its opinion in significant part on D.P.’s behavior at trial, including her outbursts, unwillingness to cooperate with instruction, and making faces at attorneys. Porter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership