Porter v. Department of Health and Human Services
Arkansas Supreme Court
286 S.W.3d 686 (2008)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
D.P., age 16, married 34-year-old Ralph Rodriguez. D.P.’s parents, Mark Porter (defendant) and his ex-wife, Diana Rolen, believed that Rodriguez was in his 20s and consented to the marriage. The Department of Health and Human Services (plaintiff) petitioned the court to remove D.P and her sister from their parents’ home, using their consent to D.P.’s marriage as one of the grounds. D.P.’s guardian ad litem moved to void D.P.’s marriage to Rodriguez. D.P.’s therapist testified that D.P. was immature and had been neglected by her parents but that she had a “strong sense of herself,” was smart, and was responsible. The trial court voided the marriage based on (1) a misrepresentation of Rodriguez’s age, (2) the best interests of D.P., and (3) D.P.’s mental capacity. On the third ground, the trial court based its opinion in significant part on D.P.’s behavior at trial, including her outbursts, unwillingness to cooperate with instruction, and making faces at attorneys. Porter appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.