Poyck v. Bryant
New York City Civil Court
820 N.Y.S.2d 774 (2006)
Stan and Michelle Bryant (defendants) rented an apartment from Peter Poyck (plaintiff). In March 2001, new neighbors moved into the apartment next to the Bryants. The new neighbors smoked in their apartment and in the common hallway, with the smoke often emanating into the Bryants’ apartment. The Bryants complained to the building superintendent and Poyck, but the smoke continued. In August 2001, the Bryants vacated the apartment. Poyck sued the Bryants seeking to collect unpaid rent from August 2001 to December 2001. The Bryants counterclaimed, alleging that the secondhand smoke to which they were subjected violated the implied warranty of habitability in their lease and constituted constructive eviction. Poyck filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hagler, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.