From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Prah v. Maretti
Wisconisin Supreme Court
108 Wis. 2d 223 (1982)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Prah (plaintiff) owned a house that used a solar-energy system for heat and hot water. The system had solar panels on the roof to supply the necessary energy. Maretti (defendant) bought an adjacent lot and planned to build a house on his lot. When Prah found out the proposed location of the house, he told Maretti that at that particular location, the house would block sunlight from getting to the solar panels on Prah’s roof and in doing so reduce the efficiency of and cause other damage to the solar system. Maretti went ahead with construction anyway. Prah instituted an action seeking injunctive relief. The Waukesha County Circuit Court granted summary judgment to Maretti. Prah appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)
Dissent (Callow, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
