Rexnord Industries, LLC v. Bigge Power Constructors, LLC

947 F. Supp. 2d 951 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rexnord Industries, LLC v. Bigge Power Constructors, LLC

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
947 F. Supp. 2d 951 (2013)

Facts

Bigge Power Constructors, LLC (Bigge) (plaintiff) was hired to build derricks for the construction of a nuclear power plant. Bigge contracted with Rexnord Industries, LLC (Rexnord) (defendant) to pay $4.5 million in exchange for 28 steel castings for use in building the derricks. Bigge accepted all the castings, but it refused to pay the final $1 million due under the contract, and Rexnord sued. Bigge counterclaimed, alleging (1) that Rexnord had failed to deliver the castings on schedule and (2) that Rexnord had failed to perform a root-cause analysis, which prevented the castings from working properly. Bigge requested damages for the expenses it had incurred due to the lack of a root-cause analysis as well as personnel and equipment expenses it had incurred due to the delayed delivery. Rexnord moved for summary judgment, arguing that Bigge was not entitled to recover these damages because the parties’ contract excluded liability for special, consequential, or incidental damages. The trial court ruled on Rexnord’s motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Adelman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership