Rice v. Rice
Supreme Court of Kentucky
336 S.W.3d 66 (Ky. 2011)
Jackie Rice (defendant) and Carolyn Rice (plaintiff) were married for 42 years. Jackie and Carolyn had a 38-year-old son, Darrin. Darrin did not live with Jackie and Carolyn. When Darrin was approximately 34 years old, Jackie helped him open credit card accounts without Carolyn’s knowledge. Jackie paid off the credit cards, but eventually debt started to accumulate. Carolyn became aware of the debt when she began receiving calls from collection agencies. Carolyn filed for divorce, at which point Darrin and Jackie’s credit card debt was $65,000. Carolyn was retired and barely had the financial means to support herself after the divorce. The trial court found that the debt was marital and allocated half of the debt to Jackie and half to Carolyn. The court of appeals affirmed. Carolyn appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Noble, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.