Sadhwani v. Sadhwani
Japan Supreme Court
52 Minshū (No. 3) 853 (1998)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
The Bank of India (the bank) sued Hong Kong residents (plaintiffs) in a Hong Kong court, demanding the Hong Kong residents’ performance of obligations pursuant to a guarantee. The Hong Kong residents counterclaimed in that first action and commenced a second action against the bank in Hong Kong, seeking subrogation. A third action was commenced in Hong Kong by the Hong Kong residents against Sadhwanis Japan Limited (Sadhwanis) (defendant), a Japanese company, seeking indemnification. The Hong Kong residents prevailed in the indemnification action and motioned for costs. The Hong Kong residents hired a Japanese attorney to serve the motion on Sadhwanis via personal delivery. Sadhwanis objected to the motion, arguing that the Hong Kong court lacked jurisdiction. The Hong Kong court entered a judgment awarding costs to the Hong Kong residents. The Hong Kong residents filed an execution action in Japan, seeking to enforce the Hong Kong court’s judgment against Sadhwanis. The Japan lower court ruled in favor of the Hong Kong residents. Sadhwanis appealed, arguing that the Hong Kong court’s judgment was unenforceable in Japan.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chikusa, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.