Samaritan Foundation v. Goodfarb

862 P.2d 870 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Samaritan Foundation v. Goodfarb

Arizona Supreme Court
862 P.2d 870 (1993)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

A child’s heart stopped during surgery at the Phoenix Children’s Hospital (Phoenix) in the Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center (Samaritan) (petitioner). A Samaritan paralegal interviewed the nurses and technician present during the surgery and prepared memoranda summarizing the interviews. The child and her parents (the family) sued Phoenix and the surgeons for medical malpractice. When deposed, the employees could not remember the incident. The family moved to compel disclosure of the paralegal’s memoranda. After reviewing the summaries in camera, the trial court indicated it would delete attorney work product and release those portions of the memoranda that were witness statements. Samaritan petitioned the court of appeals for special action, arguing that the communications summarized in the memoranda were protected by Samaritan’s attorney-client privilege. The court of appeals denied relief. The Arizona Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Martone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership