Schechter v. Schechter

63 A.D.3d 817, 881 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schechter v. Schechter

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
63 A.D.3d 817, 881 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2009)

Play video

Facts

Wendy Zehava Schechter (defendant) and David Schechter (plaintiff) agreed to arbitrate all marital issues between them before the Bais Din, a rabbinical arbitration tribunal. The Bais Din wrote a decision, awarding the parties joint custody of the couple’s 14-year-old daughter. David moved to confirm the arbitration agreement before the Supreme Court of Nassau County, the appropriate trial court. Wendy consented to the trial court confirming the award with certain exceptions. Wendy also sought sole legal custody of the couple’s daughter rather than joint custody, requesting that the trial court ascertain the daughter’s wishes. Wendy also sought to hold David in contempt due to his failure to comply with “so-ordered” stipulations. On April 1, 2008, the trial court granted David’s motion, confirming the decision by the Bais Din to award the parties joint custody and visitation of their daughter and refusing to hold David in contempt. On June 25, 2008, the trial court entered a judgment, awarding Wendy and David custody of and visitation with their daughter. Wendy appealed the trial court orders.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Skelos, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership