Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc.

731 F.2d 818 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
731 F.2d 818 (1984)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

Seattle Box Co. (Seattle Box) (defendant) held an original patent for a method for bundling oil pipes for transport. The original patent claimed that the pipe would be stacked and separated by a spacer block having a height greater than the diameter of the pipe. The same year the original patent issued, Seattle Box applied for a reissue patent broadening the claims to include a spacer block having a height substantially equal to or greater than a tier of pipe length. On July 2, 1980, Seattle Box sued Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc. (Industrial) (plaintiff) for infringement of its original patent. The reissue patent issued on August 19, 1980, and Seattle Box amended its complaint in October to allege infringement of the reissued patent. The district court found Industrial liable for infringement of both patents and awarded damages to Seattle Box. Industrial appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nichols, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership