Shel-Boze, Inc. v. Melton

509 So. 2d 106 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shel-Boze, Inc. v. Melton

Louisiana Court of Appeal
509 So. 2d 106 (1987)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

David Melton and Mildred Melton (defendant) were married. In 1983, David personally guaranteed his corporation’s indebtedness to Shel-Boze, Inc. (plaintiff). The corporation defaulted, and in 1984, Shel-Boze obtained a judgment for about $1,219, plus attorney’s fees, against the corporation and David, individually. In February 1985, Shel-Boze petitioned to garnish Mildred’s wages from Mildred’s employer. Garnishment began the following month. On May 8, 1985, Mildred petitioned for separation from David, and she subsequently obtained a judgment of separation. On the date she obtained the separation judgment, Mildred moved to dissolve the garnishment. After learning of the separation, Shel-Boze also moved to dissolve the garnishment. In early July 1985, the trial court dissolved the garnishment, required the return of Mildred’s wages garnished after May 8, 1985, and awarded Mildred damages and attorney’s fees for wrongful seizure of her wages. Shel-Boze appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Watkins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership