Shenzhen QVOD Technology Co. v. Shenzhen Admin. for Market Regulations

Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shenzhen QVOD Technology Co. v. Shenzhen Admin. for Market Regulations

Guangdong Higher People’s Court
Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2019)

Facts

Shenzhen QVOD Technology Company (QVOD) (plaintiff) hosted several copyrighted films on its web and mobile platform without authorization from the copyright holders. China’s National Copyright Administration assessed penalties against QVOD for infringing the copyrighted works of LETV Information Technology (Beijing) Company, Ltd (LETV). Later, Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Company, Ltd. (Tencent) sent several notices to QVOD requesting removal of Tencent’s copyrighted content from QVOD’s platform. QVOD ignored the requests. On Tencent’s behalf, the Shenzhen Market Regulation Administration, aka the Market Supervision Bureau (the bureau) (defendant), assessed penalties of its own against QVOD, including a large fine. QVOD brought an action against the bureau to challenge the fine, in part because QVOD had already been penalized by the National Copyright Administration. The trial court affirmed the bureau’s penalties. QVOD appealed to the Guangdong Higher People’s Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wang, Qiu, Lin, Liu, Xiao, J.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership