Smith v. Ricci

446 A.2d 501 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Smith v. Ricci

Supreme Court of New Jersey
446 A.2d 501 (1982)

Facts

Mary Smith and others (plaintiffs) appealed the enactment of a regulation by the State Board of Education (the Board) that required each local school district to develop and implement a family life education program (the program) in public elementary and high schools. The regulation was enacted in response to a detailed committee report showing increased rates of teen pregnancy and premature births in the state and the corresponding negative impacts on youths, families, and communities. The program taught students about sexuality and other similar topics such as family structure, growing up, and dating. A student could be excused from any part of the program without penalty if his or her parent submitted a signed statement indicating that the topic was in conflict with his or her religious beliefs. The plaintiffs claimed that the regulation infringed upon their right to free exercise of religion under the First Amendment. Before the appellate court heard the matter, the Supreme Court of New Jersey granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clifford, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership