Society of Survivors of the Riga Ghetto, Inc. v. Huttenbach

535 N.Y.S.2d 670 (1988)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Society of Survivors of the Riga Ghetto, Inc. v. Huttenbach

New York Supreme Court
535 N.Y.S.2d 670 (1988)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Society of Survivors of the Riga Ghetto, Inc. (SSRG) (plaintiff) consisted of Jewish survivors of a Latvian ghetto the Nazis operated from 1941 to 1943. SSRG contracted with history professor and Holocaust-studies specialist Henry Huttenbach (defendant) to write a book about survivors’ experiences. The initial contract gave SSRG ownership of and all copyrights to the manuscript and Huttenbach exclusive access to materials until the manuscript’s completion, and provided for publication under Huttenbach’s authorship with SSRG as sponsor or publisher. The second agreement reiterated SSRG’s ownership and gave Huttenbach exclusive use of materials for five years. The third contract restated the copyright agreement and provided the book would be a “work for hire” but Huttenbach was an independent writer, and Huttenbach would not prepare any book or article about the ghetto until 1991. The second and third agreements were prompted by timing issues and a chapter summary by Huttenbach published in a periodical. Huttenbach submitted initial and revised manuscripts. SSRG members were discouraged by perceived inaccuracies. The relationship deteriorated. SSRG sued Huttenbach for breach of contract and an order compelling him to return all manuscripts and materials. Huttenbach denied breaching any contract; sought to compel SSRG to proceed with editing; counterclaimed for damages, including $1,600 contractually due; and maintained he entered into the latter agreements under duress and should be declared the manuscript’s owner.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Freedman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership