Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Solomon v. Findley

808 P.2d 294 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Solomon v. Findley

Arizona Supreme Court
808 P.2d 294 (1991)

SC
Play video

Facts

Lloyd Findley (defendant) and Wilma Solomon (plaintiff) were married with one child, Adrienne (plaintiff). Findley and Solomon filed a joint petition for divorce, in which Findley agreed to pay for Adrienne’s college education. The divorce court entered a divorce decree incorporating this agreement. Solomon filed a petition for an order to show cause, claiming that Findley failed to pay for Adrienne’s education in violation of the divorce decree. The divorce court found that because Adrienne had reached the age of majority, the court no longer had jurisdiction to hear Solomon’s complaint. Solomon then filed a breach of contract claim against Findley, alleging that Findley breached the divorce agreement by failing to pay for Adrienne’s education. The trial court granted Findley’s motion to dismiss, finding that the parties’ separation agreement had merged into the divorce decree, and because the divorce court no longer had jurisdiction over the matter, Solomon’s claim must fail. The court of appeals reversed. Findley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cameron, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Family Law

Key Terms