Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sonet v. Unknown Father

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
797 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990)


Facts

Joseph Hasty’s natural maternal grandfather worked for Mary Sonet (plaintiff). Joseph’s natural mother, an unmarried teenager, surrendered Joseph to Sonet, who filed a petition for adoption. Sonet was 65 years old when Joseph was born. Over the first two years of Joseph’s life with Sonet, the Tennessee Department of Human Services (TDHS) received five neglect referrals regarding Joseph. The referrals indicated that Sonet was not properly caring for Joseph due to a lack of knowledge of how to care for an infant. At the adoption proceeding, a TDHS social counselor testified that none of the referrals warranted the removal of Joseph from Sonet. When Joseph was 16 months old, Sonet traveled to Florida for business and took Joseph with her. During their stay, the Florida Department of Health and Human Services (FHHS) was called, and FHHS removed Joseph from Sonet’s care. Joseph was returned to Sonet by court order approximately three months later. When Joseph was approximately 19 months old, TDHS had Joseph evaluated by doctors. The evaluation concluded that Joseph had been environmentally deprived and was developmentally delayed due to such deprivation. Sonet and TDHS also presented other conflicting recommendations from doctors and social workers regarding whether Sonet should continue to care for Joseph. Sonet testified that she loved Joseph and was bonded to him. The trial court dismissed Sonet’s adoption petition, finding that Sonet’s age and lack of parenting ability and Joseph’s failure to thrive indicated that Sonet’s adoption of Joseph was not in his best interest. The trial court awarded custody to TDHS. Sonet appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Cantrell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.