Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
601 N.W.2d 627 (1999)
Robert Sopha (co-plaintiff) allegedly contracted nonmalignant lung disease from making asbestos for his employer, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (defendant). In 1987 Robert and his wife Margaret Sopha (co-plaintiff) sued the company for damages caused by the disease. A state circuit court dismissed the suit on its merits and with prejudice. In 1996, Robert was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, a separate asbestos-related disease that Robert could not have foreseen with reasonable certainty in 1987. In 1997, the Sophas sued the company for this new injury. The court dismissed the 1997 suit as having been filed after the three-year limitation period lapsed. After Robert's death from mesothelioma, Margaret appealed the dismissal of the 1997 action to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.