Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Court of Appeals of California
38 Cal. Rptr. 2d 739 (1995)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Charles Sparks and his wife (plaintiffs) filed suit for personal injuries and loss of consortium against Owens-Illinois, Inc. (Owens-Illinois) (defendant). Owens-Illinois manufactured Kaylo, a type of high-temperature insulation that contained asbestos fibers, which was a carcinogenic substance directly linked to a deadly form of cancer called mesothelioma. The Sparkses alleged that Charles’s prolonged exposure to Kaylo while decommissioning a United State Navy ship caused him to develop mesothelioma. More specifically, the Sparkses claimed that Kaylo was a defective product. At trial, several expert witnesses, testifying on behalf of the Sparkses, stated that Charles’s exposure to Kaylo was clearly sufficient to have caused his mesothelioma. At the close of the evidence, the trial court instructed the jury to apply the consumer-expectations test to determine whether Kaylo was defectively designed. The jury held Owens-Illinois 100 percent responsible for the Sparkses’ injuries and awarded damages. Owens-Illinois appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Phelan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.