Spirit of the Sage Council v. Kempthorne

511 F. Supp. 2d 31 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spirit of the Sage Council v. Kempthorne

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
511 F. Supp. 2d 31 (2007)

Facts

Spirit of the Sage Council (Environmental Groups) (plaintiff), along with other Native American and environmental organizations and their members, brought an action challenging two federal rules. The Environmental Groups challenged the No Surprises Rule and the Permit Revocation Rule (Rules) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (Services) promulgated the Rules. The Services are agencies within the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce. Kempthorne (Department) (defendant) and Environmental Groups moved for cross-motions for summary judgment. Both parties dispute the court’s jurisdiction and the merits of the claims under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The Environmental Groups contended that the Rules contravened the ESA and were arbitrary and capricious under the APA. Kempthorne contended that the Environmental Groups lacked standing and their claims were not ripe for review. On the merits, Kempthorne argued that the Rules were reasonable constructions of the ESA and that the Services’ explanations of the rules complied with the APA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership