Splawn v. Splawn
Supreme Court of South Carolina
429 S.E.2d 805 (S.C. 1993)
Nathaniel Splawn (plaintiff) and Louvenia Splawn (defendant) were married. Louvenia filed a petition for divorce. The family court denied the divorce but ordered an equitable distribution of the Splawns’ property. Subsequently, Nathaniel brought suit for a divorce based on one year of continuous separation. Nathaniel requested that the family court enforce the previous equitable-distribution order. Around this time, Louvenia discovered that Nathaniel had mistakenly never divorced his first wife. Louvenia argued that, as a result, the Splawns’ marriage was void, and the family court lacked jurisdiction to equitably distribute the Splawns’ property. Despite this discovery, the family court granted Nathaniel’s request and enforced the prior equitable-distribution order. Louvenia appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.