SRI International v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
775 F.2d 1107, 227 U.S.P.Q. 577 (1985)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
SRI International (SRI) (plaintiff) held a patent on a filter for recording and reproducing color in photographic images. SRI sued Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd. (collectively, MEI) (defendants) in federal district court, alleging infringement of the filter in a camera sold by MEI. The court found that the structure of MEI’s camera and filter fell within the wording of SRI’s claims but that MEI’s product nevertheless operated to encode color in a fundamentally different way. Although these potential differences in operation remained a matter of factual dispute at trial, the court granted summary judgment in favor of MEI. SRI appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Markey, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

